• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Our Google News Channel
IRA vs 401k

IRA vs 401k

Retirement Options

  • Home
  • Roth IRA
  • Roth 401k
  • SEP IRA
  • Simple IRA
  • 401K
  • Finanace
You are here: Home / Simple IRA / D.C. National Guard chief describes ‘unusual’ Pentagon memo before Capitol riot

D.C. National Guard chief describes ‘unusual’ Pentagon memo before Capitol riot

March 4, 2021 by Retirement

The Daily Beast

D.C. National Guard Chief: Trump Pentagon Screwed Up Riot Response

Greg Nash/ReutersBureaucratic restrictions and public-relations concerns from the Army and top Trump administration Pentagon appointees unreasonably restrained the D.C. National Guard from responding to the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, its commander testified to the Senate in a dramatic Wednesday session.The Guard commander, Major General William Walker, described receiving a “frantic” phone call from the then-head of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, shortly before 2 p.m., as the breach was underway.Yet because of the restrictions from Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller, Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy, and the “best military advice” of senior Army officers, Walker and his 155 Guardsmen could not respond to the scene of the insurrection for another three hours and 19 minutes—restrictions Walker pointedly noted were not placed upon him during the summer’s Black Lives Matter protests in Washington, D.C.Had Walker been able to deploy to the Capitol “immediately,” as he testified he wanted, around 2 p.m.—a process he said took less than 20 minutes—“that number could have made a difference,” Walker said. “We could have helped extend the perimeter and pushed back the crowd.”FBI Director Shoots Back, Insisting Bureau Shared Intel Ahead of Capitol InsurrectionIt was perhaps the most intense moment thus far in a series of Senate hearings on Jan. 6 that have prompted dueling claims of irresponsibility, recriminations that have focused overwhelmingly on security and intelligence failures, rather than the politicians who spread the inciting lie that the Democrats stole the presidential election and hailed the violent protest called for by President Donald Trump.Army and Pentagon officials have heard this critique from Walker in the press and pushed back on it. Yet it was clear at the hearing that even senior Republican senators considered the Pentagon’s restrictions on the D.C. National Guard unacceptable.Walker described pre-insurrection letters from McCarthy, relaying instructions from Miller—whom Trump installed atop the Pentagon shortly after losing the election—that withheld from Walker the issuance of “weapons, ammunition, batons, ballistic protection equipment, to include body armor.” He did not have preapproval to mobilize a quick-reaction force of 40 Guardsmen and found it “unusual” to be denied a typical commanders’ authority to protect his own forces.As well, Walker described an instruction that afternoon from McCarthy to provide a “concept of operations” for the Guard before getting approval to shift from backing up the D.C. police and relieving beleaguered Capitol Police officers. “In 19 years, I never had that before happen,” Walker told senators. In several instances that day, Walker acted on his own initiative to muster the quick-reaction force at the D.C. Armory and get his Guardsmen protective gear, ahead of the belated approval to deploy to the Capitol.Neither Miller nor McCarthy testified. Instead, a senior Pentagon civilian, Robert Salesses, was left to effectively testify that Walker was wrong.Walker testified that two Army three-star generals, Charles Flynn and Walter Piatt, told him on Jan. 6 afternoon phone calls that they advised against sending the Guard to the Capitol because it was a poor “optics” and “could incite the crowd.” Salesses stoically said that Piatt, who is not in the chain of command, told him he never “used the word ‘optics,’” which represents the second revision in Piatt’s story, as the Army general recently acknowledged he may have indeed used that word.Walker shot back: “There were people in the room with me on that call that heard what they heard.”But Salesses’ broader point was that the restrictions Miller placed on Walker were political. “There was a lot of things that happened in the spring the department was criticized for,” Salesses said, referring to the Pentagon’s use of the National Guard to suppress the Black Lives Matter protests in Washington.Yet Salesses, questioned by Republican senators, could not explain all the Pentagon restrictions on the National Guard.The National Guard was on the streets of D.C. on Jan. 6 to support the D.C. police, in an unarmed and unarmored fashion, at 30 city traffic-control points and six Metro stations. Walker said he had to seek approval from the Pentagon to accompany the police in moving a traffic point over by a single block. The quick-reaction force, stationed initially at Joint Base Andrews just outside the district, was “not [designed] to respond to the events of the Capitol,” Salesses pleaded. “I don’t know if that’s true,” Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) replied, quickly prompting Walker’s agreement.Salesses also had to concede that over a half-hour passed between his account of Miller finally authorizing the Guard deployment, at 4:32 p.m., and notifying Walker of that decision at 5:08 p.m. Asked what accounted for that delay by an incredulous Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO), Salesses said only, “Senator, it’s an issue.”“That’s a significant problem for the future,” Blunt said.Read more at The Daily Beast.Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more.

Filed Under: Simple IRA

Primary Sidebar

E-mail Newsletter

More to See

Maximizing Your Retirement Savings: Expert Insights on IRAs and 401(k)s

November 23, 2024 By Roth

IRA vs 401(k): Key Differences to Help You Choose the Best Retirement Plan for 2024

November 21, 2024 By Roth

Real Estate Syndication in Indianapolis: Unlocking Investment Potential

November 15, 2024 By Retirement

Maximizing Your 401k at 55 | Retirement Strategies for Growth

October 15, 2024 By Roth

401(k) savings

Retirement Savings Options: Navigating the Path to a Secure Future

August 15, 2024 By SEO Robot

Retirement Planning

August 13, 2024 By Roth

Infographic comparing IRA vs 401(k) retirement options.

IRA and 401(k): Compare Your Retirement Options

May 20, 2024 By SEO Robot

Tags

401(k) 401(k) advantages 401(k) insights 401k at 55 401k growth strategies best retirement plan catch-up contributions exclusive listings Financial Planning financial planning 2024 Financial Security future planning Indianapolis property market Investing Investment Investment Options Investment Strategies IRA IRA benefits IRA strategies IRA vs 401k Labrosse Real Estate luxury homes luxury real estate maximize retirement savings multi-family investment Indianapolis passive income through real estate Personal Finance premium properties property syndication real estate investment real estate syndication Indianapolis Retirement retirement advice retirement investment Retirement Planning retirement planning 2024 Retirement Savings retirement savings tips retirement strategies retirement tips Savings secure retirement secure retirement funds Wealth Management

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Google News

Recent

  • Roth IRA Contribution and Income Limits for 2025
  • Maximizing Your Retirement Savings: Expert Insights on IRAs and 401(k)s
  • IRA vs 401(k): Key Differences to Help You Choose the Best Retirement Plan for 2024
  • Real Estate Syndication in Indianapolis: Unlocking Investment Potential
  • Maximizing Your 401k at 55 | Retirement Strategies for Growth